News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by sandworm101 on Thursday August 16, 2018 @09:51AM (#17774568)
Between the lines: it was Tor.

Deploys on computers. Web-based. Detectable through decryption or pattern analysis. Firewalls. It was a pair of Tor hidden services. The mistake was probably that they ran both on the same machine with only a firewall separating them, rather than physically different servers.

Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by jandrese on Thursday August 16, 2018 @10:06AM (#17774679)
And on the hidden website there was a link back to cia.gov somewhere.

On the other hand I'm surprised tor works in China at all. I would expect the Great Firewall to shut down all entrance/exit nodes going into or out of the country, except maybe for a few controlled by the government.

Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by Hello71 on Saturday August 18, 2018 @08:42PM (#17791785)
The security level varies frequently. It's known that meek still works in China, which is probably a major reason why both Google and Amazon have shut down domain fronting.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by hackermailman on Thursday August 16, 2018 @10:58AM (#17775170)
Which sounds like a management decision to cut costs by running them on the same server. This is probably why we are seeing ex regime department heads in the news lately as political pundits in hopes they create enough deflection to avoid prosecution for 30+ agents dying on their watch.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by obmelvin on Thursday August 16, 2018 @12:13PM (#17775903)
Do you seriously think the CIA cared about server costs for something like this?
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by jessaustin on Thursday August 16, 2018 @04:29PM (#17778185)
The less money they spend on this kind of thing, the more they have to funnel to their second cousin's shell corporation. With no oversight, performance degrades.
Re:Botched CIA Communications System Helped Blow Cover of Ch... by hackermailman on Thursday August 16, 2018 @12:36PM (#17776169)
Sure, that's some manager's performance bonus. When I briefly worked for Nav Canada our manager decided to buy the cheapest dollar store pens possible in order to pad his performance metrics. We also had to sign them out individually from his safe. Not at all surprised if a CIA manager did a risk analysis and decided lets use the same server(s) and save a few dollars the risk is acceptable.