There's a simple solution to avoiding buying in expensive locations though - buy in cheap locations.
Fortunately there are many places that someone in NZ can buy a house.
https://www.realestate.co.nz/3379275
For example is proavly affordable on minimum wage of $32k, certainly with two incomes.
It’s a town of 1700 people, described by Wikipedia as a “gang town”. If your point is that it’s possible to buy a house in NZ, sure. But quality of life is totally a thing, no?
And even then, your example requires a $40k deposit while earning $32k, a salary which doesn’t appear to have a whole lot left over and the end of the week.
My understanding is that skyrocketing housing prices aren't much of a benefit to anyone who doesn't own more than one home. Because you always need to live in at least one place, your economic elasticity only kicks in when the number of homes you buy and sell is greater than one.
https://www.interest.co.nz/property/house-price-income-multi...
https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentis...
That's quite a normal multiplier in today's low interest and 2 income world (in parts of London the multipler is 38!)
What you're saying is that you can't afford to live in nice areas of Auckland. So don't.
Local buys an equivalent house to the one they sold for $500k + transaction fees, which scale based on the price of the house
Local has less money than when they started