It's also patent nonsense.
It would be really great if you can elaborate your point. For example, why do you think it is nonsense? What line of argument or examples can you provide to make your point?
Here’s an example:
@GP
Perhaps stating it as a fact sounds a bit too strong me. How did you come to realize this fact? Do you have any source or “experiential evidence” for stating it as a fact. Perhaps I misunderstood your analogy but I would be very happy to hear your full point.
Calling a declaration patent nonsense is not "name-calling". Stuff which is "attacking and name-calling" however include:
* insinuating that the IRS rejects pre-filling declaration because they "would make less money" despite them having supported that effort
* declaring that tax declaration is "like a poker game" and that it's "just a fact" is
* insulting other commenters, as ransom1538 has done and I have not
> Moreover it's unsubstantive to just declare "nonsense" without explaining anything to the reader.
Why would I need to substantiate a disagreement with an unsubstantiated assertion?
You disagree that americans pay more than they should? [1]
[1] https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/taxes/2018-tax-report/
Or you disagree that paying less than you should has consequences?
https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/irs/tax-responsibilities/...
People like you ruin this message board.
This is because the IRS would make less money. It is like a poker game. Their number can only be smaller than yours. If you go under their number they penalize you. If you go over their number they keep the difference.