News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You Cannot Serve Two Masters: The Harms of Dual Affiliation by stochastician on Friday August 10, 2018 @03:26PM (#17736094)
I do not think this is what the piece is arguing. Rather, the concern is that by creating these 80/20 splits, the core values of the university are compromised. There's nothing a priori wrong with industrial research, it's this attempted hybrid that's problematic. Hence the title, "you cannot serve two masters".

Quoting the piece, "Part of the point of being a big company is to control your environment by crushing, containing, or co-opting inconvenient innovations." I think the author is arguing that attitude is fundamentally at odds with the values of the academy.

Re:You Cannot Serve Two Masters: The Harms of Dual Affiliation by rlkf on Friday August 10, 2018 @04:26PM (#17736492)
If BigCompany expects its research center to crush inconvenient innovations, they're not really running a research center, they're just calling it that because they like the titles.
Re:You Cannot Serve Two Masters: The Harms of Dual Affiliation by hnbroseph on Friday August 10, 2018 @04:40PM (#17736575)
i read "inconvenient" as "competing". if your r&d can lead to a few choice patents (or you "just" buy them) you can sometimes hamstring competition or get little graft by leeching off competitor's developments.
Re:You Cannot Serve Two Masters: The Harms of Dual Affiliation by buth_lika on Friday August 10, 2018 @10:44PM (#17737986)
The point of being a big company, not the point of running a research center.