News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by undreren on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:05AM (#17721934)
> One criticism of New York Times that I've read online is that they won't allow you to cancel your digital subscription through their website. They force you to call them. I'm not sure if that has changed recently, but that's a pretty questionable dark pattern.

This is illegal in Europe. By law, it has to be at least as easy to cancel subscriptions, as it is to buy them.

I love Europe. :)

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by Niten on Thursday August 09, 2018 @03:25AM (#17722228)
It's also illegal in California, too, so I expect NYTimes will ultimately have to change their behavior: http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/07/thanks-to-california-a-news...
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by anarazel on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:39AM (#17722049)
>> One criticism of New York Times that I've read online is that they won't allow you to cancel your digital subscription through their website. They force you to call them. I'm not sure if that has changed recently, but that's a pretty questionable dark pattern.

FWIW, I have a "cancel subscription" link in my profile.

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by dmix on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:57AM (#17722122)
Same, I canceled easily via the web app recently when they decided to doubled down on being another partisan rag like WaPo, feeding off the outrage culture which does well on social media these days.

I see it's paid off commercially, no doubt, as it's seemed to have attracted a new wider user base as the lower quality comment sections now reflects on every political article. Including the NYT selected preferred comments which I used to find held a basic level of neutrality and civililty.

Business is business though, and it's always hard to balance scale with quality.

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by lsmarigo on Thursday August 09, 2018 @05:23AM (#17722718)

  they decided to doubled down on being another partisan rag like WaPo, feeding off the outrage culture 
is it really a decision when the other option is financial ruin? Thoughtful, calm, reasoned posts don't stand a chance in the context of online media. The system we've ended up with fundamentally requires outrage/fear/clickbait to stand a chance of being heard among the noise.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by cm2187 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @03:44AM (#17722307)
Even the Financial Time is starting to drift in that direction...
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by madza on Thursday August 09, 2018 @03:55AM (#17722352)
I’m not alone then. I moved my subscription from the NYT to FT looking for a less politically slanted product but the tone at the FT is definitely going in the same direction. Any suggestions?

P.s I have to phone the FT to cancel my subscription apparently.

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by throwaway080383 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @09:29AM (#17723980)
I like Wall Street Journal. It's more business-focused, and definitely has a conservative bend, with occasional editorials that are much more out there (the benefits of prayer in school or something), but since I'm left-leaning, it feels pretty good on balance.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by TheAceOfHearts on Thursday August 09, 2018 @10:18AM (#17724392)
The wall Street Journal lost my support after they came out with a shitty hit piece [0] against PewDiePie. I read some of their arguments, but found em to be pretty damn shallow.

Although they came out against him, if you actually watch the source videos I don't think they had a strong case. This was one of the key posts that made me lose trust in WSJ as an organization.

[0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney-severs-ties-with-youtube...

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by jriot on Thursday August 09, 2018 @12:21PM (#17725569)
The still didn't hire an openly racist/sexist woman to their board.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by nebolo on Thursday August 09, 2018 @09:06AM (#17723842)
Yes, perhaps partially, but would you not agree that the amount of outrage-worthy news has also increased? Perhaps the issue is not the lens, but the reality...
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by RobSim on Thursday August 09, 2018 @09:21AM (#17723924)
I really like Axios - less content, but shorter, with great newsletters, and fully ad supported (for now, I think they're really VC supported)
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by Paul-ish on Thursday August 09, 2018 @11:48AM (#17725221)
The Economist is good.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by cm2187 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @04:06AM (#17722405)
Well it is only starting to move in that direction, they are clearly running campaigns on certain topics (like feminism), and I skip any article on Trump, Brexit or Boris Johnson. But outside of that it’s still OK.

I’d say the most neutral news will come from news agencies (reuters, afp, etc). There you get the raw material (what happened) without the comments. For business news bloomberg is the (expensive) equivalent. But occasionally there is important original content in the FT so I am not contemplating cancelling my subscription for the time being.

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by dmix on Thursday August 09, 2018 @11:01AM (#17724741)
I use WSJ personally.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by 628C6l0 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @11:10PM (#17730416)
Did you try to click on it? I had the same button last year when I cancelled. When I clicked, it took me to a page where I'm asked to call them?
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by dazc on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:07AM (#17721942)
I don't know of the legality but it is a common practice in Europe too.
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by undreren on Thursday August 09, 2018 @05:00AM (#17722629)
Really? Where?
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by dazc on Thursday August 09, 2018 @08:25AM (#17723550)
From my personal experience, just about everywhere. Just yesterday I wanted to cancel my AA membership (the motoring organisation, that is) and there was no other option but to phone.

Pertinent to this thread I had a subscription with The Times and the only cancellation option was by phone.

Anecdotally, it's very common with phone and utility providers too.

Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by zoidb on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:37AM (#17722033)
I recently tried to cancel my mcfit gym membership in Germany which was much more difficult than signing up. In this case you actually had to mail them a letter by post to cancel, where signing up was done on-site in 10minutes. Maybe you are referring to online subscriptions?
Re:New York Times Co. Reports $24M Profit, Thanks to Digital... by dspillett on Thursday August 09, 2018 @03:46AM (#17722312)
I don't know about the legality, but it is certainly common place over here even with periodicals that seem reputable (I recently cancelled New Scientist: sign-up was done easily any time online, cancellation has to be done by phone call inside office hours).