Re:Are Facebook and YouTube quasi-governmental actors?
by tomp on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @07:17PM
(#17711803)
In many western countries you're also not allowed to discriminate against pregnant women, or because of religion, both of which are under an individual's control (except if rape).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Are Facebook and YouTube quasi-governmental actors?
by kingbirdy on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @07:23PM
(#17711840)
Because those are decisions we've collectively decided we should support people's right to make. There's not much support for the right to decide to be an asshole.
Re:Are Facebook and YouTube quasi-governmental actors?
by beaconstudios on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @07:46PM
(#17711961)
but there is - that's what the right to free speech is. As the old saying goes, popular speech doesn't need to be protected. Being "an asshole" is not an objective measure, so you need to draw a line in the sand between legal and illegal speech. Free speech is the line that says "you can say anything" except for a few specific cases that are liable to put people in direct fear for their lives/wellbeing.