I feel like it mainly does that because Musk fails to set realistic expectations and then goes on tantrums whenever someone is negative about the outlook.

I admire his ambition and he is great for Tesla in general but as far as managing a public company his approach hasn't been very successful.

> I feel like it mainly does that because Musk fails to set realistic expectations and then goes on tantrums whenever someone is negative about the outlook.

That's about as fair as saying there's a cabal of billionaires shorting Tesla stock and using their media companies to drive the price down every chance they get. Either way, going private eliminates the noise.

This is true. For example, deadline for Model 3 was set much lower compare the Bolt. Even though Tesla make money on every sell of Model 3 and GM loses on every sell of Bolt money. Tesla is the one in negative news because of too high expectations.

So how do all the other companies do it then? It is not like Tesla is the only public company where some or all employees hold stock, and it is not the only one with a volatile stock price either.

There are fewer public companies all the time https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-09/where-hav...

There's a financial crisis of one type or another every 7 years. Each time, more and more regulation is put in place to make sure it doesn't happen again. It's only a matter of time before congress hangs too many ornaments on that particular christmas tree and it falls over.

I remember when Sarbanes Oxley was passed in 2002. I was in college and one of my professors was advocating becoming a SAP engineer specializing in SOX compliance. The cost of compliance was estimated to be gigantic, which meant lots of highly paid (but boring) work for enterprise programmers.

I agree with this. This is the main reason I don't hold cryptocurrencies. I can't concentrate on work when I have to watch the price the whole time.