Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by Joeri on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:32PM
(#17708118)
If you think you can legislate the world away from big data and data mining through legislation you are terribly naive. At most it will punish a few surface level players
If you think you can legislate the world of crime away through criminal law you are terribly naive. At most it will punish a few criminals here or there while the massive crime industry continues to flourish.
Just because something bad is hard to regulate doesn’t mean you just give up. Besides, saying decentralization is the solution is even more naive, because centralized systems are more convenient and people prefer convenience to privacy.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by binomialxenon on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:57PM
(#17708907)
Sure, centralized services are popular, but there's nothing unrealistic about decentralized/federated ones, it's not a pipe dream like the blockchain craze. The main difference in end-user convenience is the difference between "@username" and "@username:server.net".
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by modzu on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:26PM
(#17708048)
you think its naive to change the law but "behavior change" is a viable alternative?? the reason the op is claiming we need legislation is precisely because there is no incentive to change behavior.
im not even an EU citizen and already ive benefited from GDPR
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by rootusrootus on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @02:01PM
(#17708943)
That's like trying to solve global warming by telling everyone to be more efficient. Good luck with that.
This rabbit is not going back in the hat. We need better tools which respect users, behaviour change via a new common sense, and decentralization. Not flashy legal theatrics that is out of date well before its written in law.