News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production. Parent comment

Re:Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production by Bombthecat on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @03:01AM (#17704378)
With DO you mean digital Ocean?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production by lloeki on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @04:02AM (#17704622)
I guess so since RancherOS is available as a fully supported option (as well as Fedora Atomic and CoreOS).

FWIW we're running a simple, custom cluster made of Debian droplets set up using kubeadm.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production by alexpi on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @03:58AM (#17704607)
I think DO stands for DC/OS in this context
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production by minxomat on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @04:41AM (#17704782)
No, I actually meant DigitalOcean. We tested both Rancher (k8s) and Portainer (Swarm) backed by DO Infrastructure. Both worked well. Of course it's not a managed solution, but both are operationally very easy. DO also announced native k8s support, so I'm excited for that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Horrors of Using Azure Kubernetes Service in Production by sitepodmatt on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @05:35AM (#17705010)
It's in beta and closed access at the moment though https://www.digitalocean.com/products/kubernetes/ Would be interested as test/QA environment but I guess combined with 'CPU Optimized Droplets' could work for production loads too
[ Parent | on HN ]