News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Standing versus Sitting by LogicHoleFlaw on Tuesday April 29, 2008 @02:03PM (#176784)
You jest, but I would seriously consider spending (my own) money on such a thing. Poor ergonomics can result in skeletal, muscular, and tendon stress injuries. I have yet to find a chair or desk that really suit my shape and posture, and the aching back I have at the end of the week is becoming more and more of a concern as time goes on.
Re:Standing versus Sitting by henning on Tuesday April 29, 2008 @02:12PM (#176793)
Plus, if your startup fails, you can wheel your Aeron chair out of the door as a severance package while Michael Arrington flings mendacious personal attacks at you on TechCrunch with gleeful schadenfreude.
Re:Standing versus Sitting by LogicHoleFlaw on Tuesday April 29, 2008 @02:19PM (#176795)
Supposedly Aeron chairs don't depreciate much over time. You could sell the chairs and even get most of your money back! I recall reading somewhere that the Aeron chairs companies bought during the big bubble were their most valuable assets when they went under.

Schadenfreude indeed.

Re:Standing versus Sitting by RyanGWU82 on Tuesday April 29, 2008 @03:21PM (#176883)
They're like cars -- they depreciate a great deal as soon as you drive them off the lot, but then depreciation slows considerably. If you buy a used one and keep it in good condition, it probably won't depreciate hardly at all.