News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why a Typical Home Solar Setup Does Not Work with the Gri... by dang on Thursday August 02, 2018 @12:57PM (#17673103)
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Why a Typical Home Solar Setup Does Not Work with the Gri... by maxerickson on Thursday August 02, 2018 @09:40PM (#17676761)
My comment is snarky, but it doesn't criticize a weaker interpretation of what they said, it points out a problem with the phrasing. The "I'm being silly" is an acknowledgement that the snark isn't really addressing the substance, the strongest plausible interpretation of "I'm being silly" is that I understood their meaning well enough.
Re:Why a Typical Home Solar Setup Does Not Work with the Gri... by dang on Friday August 03, 2018 @05:01AM (#17678290)
Fair enough on the "I'm being silly"—that does take the edge out of the comment and that's good. But I'm not sure it gets rid of it.

Pointing out "problems with the phrasing" doesn't make for very substantive discussions. Also, snark is deprecated here. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

Re:Why a Typical Home Solar Setup Does Not Work with the Gri... by slededit on Friday August 03, 2018 @09:31AM (#17679650)
I disagree with you on the phrasing aspect for this specific case. When discussing an advertising message the phrasing is extremely important.

Albeit the thread didn't invite substantive discussion on it because of the snark.