Re:China's Peer-To-Peer Lenders Are Falling Like Dominoes as...
by Someguywhatever on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:08PM
(#17666464)
I feel like the Market Segment is so small, and your costs will be so high, and it requires so much expertise and oversight/monitoring that it won't be worth it.
Re:China's Peer-To-Peer Lenders Are Falling Like Dominoes as...
by Woberto on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @08:30PM
(#17668320)
"Worth it" is subjective; it doesn't necessarily have to be about turning a big profit. In fact if it's a nonprofit, then the goal could be to just help under-served communities, and it seems like it could have a positive enough impact to attract some angel investors
> Why do they refuse to lend if it is profitable?
Good question.
Note I didn't say it is profitable for the banks to lend to those segments. I said those segments can be lent to profitably.
In order to profitably lend to customers who banks turn away (mostly those with a 'bad' credit history based on credit bureau data, or those with little/no data at the credit bureau), you need:
1) Effective credit underwriting (i.e. accurate models/processes to decide whether to accept a particular application, and how much to lend to that applicant at this time), and
2) Efficient processes of acquiring, onboarding and servicing customers.
When a bank lends 10k at 8% for 3 years to a low risk customer, they'll make over 1k in interest over the life of the loan. So they can afford to have inefficient operations/systems.
When you lend 500 to a customer who is likely to pay back, e.g. 600 over the next 6 months, there's only 100 in risk-adjusted margin there, to cover all your costs of underwriting the loan, following up on missed payments etc.