The Bullshit Web

Re:The Bullshit Web by TeMPOraL on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @03:46PM (#17656420)

Hence the rant mentioning Molochian economy, under which we operate. And that reference explains in depth why this is a very hard problem.

I like the rant too. Except maybe the bit about sending content at the speed of humans - I for one would like to take lightweight, bullshit-free content as fast as it can be sent, to pipe it to further processing on my end, in the never-ending quest to automate things in my life.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by exolymph on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @05:13PM (#17657194)

Background for anyone who hasn't read it: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by meowface on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @07:26PM (#17658227)

I highly recommend everyone give this a read if they haven't. It's probably the best post on Slate Star Codex.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by cheezymoogle on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @03:54PM (#17656499)

I mean, if you're just reducing the content even further, just request that they make the reduction possible server-side and everybody wins.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by TeMPOraL on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @04:03PM (#17656578)

I was more thinking about e.g. running a script to fetch 3 different lightweight sites, run some personal code on it and combine the data. If the script would spend 99.9% of its time waiting on IO because of "human speeds", I wouldn't be too happy.

That said, I would be willing to bite the bullet and accept speed limits across the board if it resulted in lean web.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by JetSpiegel on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @05:57PM (#17657602)

I achieve this with an RSS reader, in my case Miniflux.

Runs on a RPi under my TV and I stay well below my 300MB data cap, while consuming dozens of news sources.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by voltagex_ on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @02:27AM (#17660157)

Which news sources? How did you find the ones that still provide RSS? How much of it do you actually read?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by JetSpiegel on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:44AM (#17660387)

I read virtually all of them. Most of them provide RSS feeds, some are a bit hidden but it's Googlable.

I started with the basics BBC, NYT, Guardian, The Intercept for general news, The Conversation for science news without sensationalism, and some tech blogs. Then I just read most of it, and follow some links to find new sources. Most of the times news start with "As reported by X", or just a link, so you can discover new sources like that.

You can also browse HN (and n-gate for the highlights) and Reddit to discover new sources.

If you add so much you can't keep up, remove some, or change the feeds into section feeds. Most online newspapers provide them. I miss Yahoo Pipes, and have yet to find a simple hosted alternative. There is also RSS Bridge for sites without feeds (Twitter, Facebook), but I still haven't found the time to set it up.

You can also add paywalled sources to read the headlines only. You can mark them as read from the index.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Bullshit Web by cheezymoogle on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @04:18PM (#17656711)

I think this is why batch jobs and crontabs exist. Just do what the BBSes used to do for syncing--wait until anti-peak-time and then let loose.

[ Parent | on HN ]