Re:Serverless, Inc. lands $10M Series A to build serverless ...
by laumars on Monday July 30, 2018 @05:20PM
(#17648144)
I don't think it's being pedantic if your analogy is based on a basic premise that is fundamentally untrue. I get there is no such thing as a perfect analogy but I'd at least expect the subject to be factually acuate even if the comparison is subjective.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Serverless, Inc. lands $10M Series A to build serverless ...
by dang on Monday July 30, 2018 @06:01PM
(#17648530)
Would both of you please stop this ridiculous spat.
Re:Serverless, Inc. lands $10M Series A to build serverless ...
by laumars on Monday July 30, 2018 @07:03PM
(#17648993)
What spat? This is the first time I've chatted to the guy and I harbor no ill will towards him.
Isn't the point of HN that you can have a discussion when you disagree with someone?
Re:Serverless, Inc. lands $10M Series A to build serverless ...
by dang on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @01:15AM
(#17650705)
The point of HN is that you can have a civil, substantive discussion.
I called it a spat because you both got personal. It's nice that you both enjoyed it, but it's still against the rules here. It sets a bad example for others, who unfortunately aren't so convivial.
Re:Serverless, Inc. lands $10M Series A to build serverless ...
by laumars on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @01:46AM
(#17650817)
Condescending perhaps, but there was no personal attacks and certainly none any worse nor less substantive than your terse reply (which, it's worth mentioning, was also after the discussion had already reached its natural conclusion).