News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why don't more men take their wife's surname when they ma... by kqr on Sunday July 29, 2018 @12:54PM (#17639034)
Interesting. I am marrying my fiancée in less than a month, so I've had time to think about this. I would have loved to take her name, but in the end, we decided that both will carry my name. Basically for this reason:

> In medieval England, men who married women from wealthier, more prestigious families would sometimes take their wife’s last name, says Stephanie Coontz, a professor of marriage and family history at Evergreen State College. From the 12th to the 15th century, Coontz told me, in many “highly hierarchical societies” in England and France, “class outweighed gender.”

It's not that I am particularly high-born; in fact, I think her family would count as much more high-status than mine. But her family name is very ordinary, and my surname sounds royal and is spelled in a very old-style aristocratic way. I strongly believe this has given me opportunities I would not otherwise have gotten, and it's something we both think it'd be foolish to give up.

Re:Why don't more men take their wife's surname when they ma... by maxerickson on Sunday July 29, 2018 @01:55PM (#17639379)
Say your name were Stephanie Coontz and you were marrying a fellow named England France. You could legally change your name to Stephanie France Coontz (dropping a given middle name or not) and then continue to go professionally by Stephanie Coontz.
Re:Why don't more men take their wife's surname when they ma... by sjg007 on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @03:03PM (#17665841)
You can legally change your name to whatever you want as long as you are not trying to escape a debt or prison or something..