News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by gepi79 on Friday July 27, 2018 @01:49PM (#17627732)
I agree.

Where weight and size do not matter, more choices for batteries are possible.

E.g. redox flow batteries.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/fuel-cells/its-big-and-...

In the near future, atmospheric CO2 will be recycled to create organic fuel.

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2017/09/18/solar-fuel-system-recyc...

https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-r...

Solid state batteries are also interesting. Lithium-ion batteries will be replaced because they can develop dendrites and catch fire.

https://cleantechnica.com/2018/06/26/the-solid-state-lithium...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324734826_Non-Tradi...

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/17/04/19/016213/the-slas...

Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by jp555 on Friday July 27, 2018 @06:17PM (#17629906)
“In the near future, atmospheric CO2 will be recycled to create organic fuel”

That’s been around for quite a while already; you’re describing a tree.

Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by syngrog66 on Friday July 27, 2018 @07:17PM (#17630269)
yes but... 3D printed by a neural net at Trees.com ON A BLOCKCHAIN and crowdsourced with a Kickstarter from curated ambi-sexual SanFran hipsters, avail in 5 colors for pre-order at a low low annual subscription add-on for Prime members of $79.99
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by deedree on Saturday July 28, 2018 @09:56AM (#17633175)
I shouldn't feed the troll. But since you made me chuckle, did you mistake hckrnews for reddit maybe? :P
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by smilekzs on Friday July 27, 2018 @07:06PM (#17630202)
--- at a rate orders of magnitude faster than trees currently do
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by jp555 on Friday July 27, 2018 @09:32PM (#17630955)
Ah, you mean grass?
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by semi-extrinsic on Friday July 27, 2018 @04:47PM (#17629245)
> In the near future, atmospheric CO2 will be recycled to create organic fuel.

If you have unlimited free energy in this near future, then maybe you can do what yoj say (or maybe electrolysis to produce hydrogen is better/more profitable).

Otherwise no, this won't happen.

Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by gepi79 on Friday July 27, 2018 @05:55PM (#17629742)
IMO liquid or solid fuel at normal pressure and temperature is much cheaper and easier and safer to store than hydrogen.

Besides:

http://carbonengineering.com

http://www.climeworks.com

From https://lustysociety.org/ethics.html#climate:

Annual global fossil fuel subsidies amounting to $5.3 trillion in 2015 (6.5% of global GDP).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X1...

According to the Global Carbon Atlas: 36 183 million metric tons of CO2 emissions in 2016.

According to estimates in 2018 by Carbon Engineering and Climeworks: The cost of capturing 1 metric ton CO2 from the air costs $ 600 in 2018 and could fall under $ 100 in 5 - 10 years. A plant could make a liter fuel for a dollar.

At a cost of $ 600 per metric ton of CO2, the capture of the emissions of 2016 (36 183 million metric tons) costs $ 21 710 billion or $ 21.7 trillion.

At a cost of $ 100 per metric ton of CO2, the capture of the emissions of 2016 (36 183 million metric tons) costs $ 3 618 billion or $ 3.6 trillion.

The organic fuel should be used with batteries and fuel cells and not with combustion engines.

In order to decrease the CO2 concentration in the environment, the waste products must be contained and recycled later without release into the atmosphere.

Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by ben_w on Friday July 27, 2018 @05:30PM (#17629575)
PV is growing at 30-40% per year for many years now. This year’s end-of-year forecast is 0.5 TW, extrapolating that trend gives 11.5-28.3 TW in December 2030.
Re:Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries? by rbanffy on Friday July 27, 2018 @09:32PM (#17630951)
Hydrogen may be more energetic than a lot of stuff per unit of mass, but we shouldn't forget the tanks we need to carry it around are anything but light.