Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by pvg on Thursday July 26, 2018 @11:20AM
(#17618143)
It doesn't really explain what 'Premier League analyst' is. Is this someone who works for a particular club? Or writes for some publication? Or walks the earth like Caine of Kung Fu, offering analysis to those in need?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by dpleuler on Thursday July 26, 2018 @11:37AM
(#17618297)
I'm the other analyst mentioned in the article, but my position is probably quite similar.
I work with a team's coaching staff and management to help them make more data-driven decisions. This ranges from topics around opposition analysis to player recruitment.
Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by pvg on Thursday July 26, 2018 @11:47AM
(#17618380)
Oh, I coffeelessly missed that bit. Analyst for an MLS team sounds even more interesting. You should do an AMA, perhaps.
Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by omaranto on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:41PM
(#17620318)
Why does being an analyst for an MLS team sound more interesting than being an analyst for a Premier League team?
Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by pvg on Thursday July 26, 2018 @04:57PM
(#17621044)
It seems more interesting to hear from an insider under those circumstances. For starters, an MLS analyst might actually be able and willing to chitchat with you. MLS is an odd place compared to the top European leagues - there's no threat of relegation, no scrambling to earn Champions or Europa League spots and, comparatively, also no money. There's the business with the 'designated players'. The dominant sport in this particular analyst's market is ice hockey. Etc.
Re:The unreasonable effectiveness of Soccermatics? (2017)
by tbiteteitb on Thursday July 26, 2018 @11:34AM
(#17618257)
'Premier' meaning the England soccer competition