News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by jbarham on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @01:47PM (#1760635)
> Nobody’s going to pay Google $25 a year to store their music in a cloud.

I'd pay that to be rid of iTunes.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by wccrawford on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:07PM (#1760731)
I think the question is: "What else do I get for that $25?"

I hate dealing with my library of songs. If I could stream it to any device, any time, as well as have -any- other value-added service attached, I'd pay the $25 per year.

By 'any device' I mean TV, PC, Android Phone, PS3 and more. Basically, any device that I can hook to the internet.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by rospaya on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @05:11PM (#1761509)
As much as I hate dealing with a lot of files and ID3 tags, streaming music sucks for mobile devices for a couple of reasons:

- 3G quality and speeds are guarranteed everywhere and every time. I was left with nothing but the songs I had on my SD card when I was on vacation on an island.

- Constant streaming kills battery life, killing your phone and music player in one kick.

- Because of massive roaming charges, you can forget using it outside of the country.

If you don't travel much, have a good plan and don't mind the battery issue, it could be useful.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by 1010011010 on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:05PM (#1760724)
Me too. iTunes is just horrible. I'd love a non-iTunes way of getting my music onto an iPod.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by digitallogic on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:07PM (#1760730)
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by thought_alarm on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @03:25PM (#1761047)
Yes, trying out other music managers is a very good way to come to appreciate iTunes and how it works. I encourage everyone who thinks they're unhappy with iTunes to check out these other applications.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by icegreentea on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @04:46PM (#1761409)
The Winamp iPod manager wasn't so bad. Sure, there was no drag and drop, but I always kept dropping in the wrong place anyways. The biggest problem was how it handled certain aspects of tags and labelling different from iTunes. It really wasn't a problem if all you ever used was Winamp, but if you started with iTunes, and switched to Winamp, it would just reorder your music (the most obvious example being 0-9 coming before/after a-z), and piss you off.

Today, I use foobar to play my music. And I keep iTunes around to load my iPod. Cause as stupidly annoying as iTunes is, foobar gets it worse.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by lukifer on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @04:03PM (#1761210)
iTunes is a great personal media database, and a terrible everything else. The former is enough to make me willing to put up with the latter.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by bad_user on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @01:51AM (#1762892)
Yes, but why can't I just drag and drop mp3 files on my iPod/iPhone directly from the file manager?
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by aw3c2 on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @06:08AM (#1763327)
Because you purchased an Apple product.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by jobu on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @03:24PM (#1761045)
The iTunes UI is horrid, but I have yet to find anything that does everything iTunes can without being crashy, slow or non-intuitive.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by blehn on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @05:30PM (#1761572)
Can you elaborate? I think the store is frustrating, but I've found the player itself has been pretty stable and usable for the last 6-7 years on OSX (I have 40GB of music btw). It's a big ol' spreadsheet with instant search and drag+drop playlists.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by thegreatcurve on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @05:58PM (#1761682)
I find the spreadsheet-style interface pretty uninspired for something as personal as music. The linear list of albums/tracks breaks down very quickly once your library starts growing, and iTunes becomes a confusing, disorientating mess. To Apple's credit, they've been taking baby steps towards more interesting ways of browsing your library with Genius playlists and mixes, but they could and should do so much more.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by ugh on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @06:12PM (#1761742)
What are the alternatives, though?

I quite like the three column browser for quickly finding music even if I only have a very fuzzy idea of what I would like right now. It scales quite well, even if you have a library with several thousand songs and a few hundred artists. Together with the hybrid cover view it doesn’t even look very much like a spreadsheet.

Then there’s the grid view which also has its uses. I especially like to display albums by year which gives me a nice chronological overview. Coverflow is pretty worthless, though.

I think that while iTunes gets the big picture somewhat right (at least as far as its audio library functionality is concerned) it gets many details spectacularly wrong. The UI for tagging feels ancient. Oh, and it’s modal. iTunes forces me to play column jockey. I don‘t want to change column widths just so I don’t get vertical scrollbars. iTunes should keep it all nice and tidy for me, kind of like Mail. That, and many other small details.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by icefox on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @08:49PM (#1762250)
Amarok has some interesting UI features that are really interesting.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by ugh on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @01:39AM (#1762858)
Like what? This is a honest question. I don't know much about Amarok but whenever I tried it, it looked completely unimpressive and like an even bigger UI clusterfuck than iTunes to me.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by 1010011010 on Friday October 08, 2010 @06:56AM (#1771205)
iTunes opens lots of error dialogs, loses files and fails to play tracks when it's run in an account with an nfs home directory.
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by 1010011010 on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @02:38PM (#1760857)
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by jmtulloss on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @06:17PM (#1761767)
If you have an iPhone, Android, or Blackberry, Rdio is awesome for getting music on there. Way easier than iTunes, if you ask me.

Disclaimer: I totally work for them.

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by capedape on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @08:28PM (#1762199)
This will do it on windows: http://www.mediamonkey.com/ (I have no vested interest in this company other than continued development for my personal use)

edit didn't see the comparison below, but this works very well with Iphone/pod/pad

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by Tichy on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @05:07AM (#1763238)
What happened to the YC startup that allowed you to store all your music in the cloud?
Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by spicyj on Thursday October 07, 2010 @11:16PM (#1770455)
Are you thinking of Lala? It was acquired by Apple and subsequently shut down.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lala_(website)

Re:The Dream Is Over: Music Labels Have Killed Their Digital... by guelo on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @03:03PM (#1760956)
If Google's plan is to use Simplify Media's tech then it will probably be a plugin for Winamp and iTunes.