Re:The Dark Silicon Problem and What It Means for CPU Design...
by Elrac on Monday July 23, 2018 @05:57AM
(#17591655)
The author's sentence is essentially a truism, because fiddling with information _as such_ and in theory doesn't use up any energy. As practically implemented in current CPU electronics, though, information needs to be communicated from point A to point B as a change in voltage. To convey that voltage change means having to move some amount of electrical charge into or out of the tiny capacitor that is a transistor's gate, via the non-perfect conductor that is the doped-silicon trace between the two points. Resistance saps part of the energy moving those electrons around and converts it to heat.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Dark Silicon Problem and What It Means for CPU Design...
by dnautics on Monday July 23, 2018 @02:16PM
(#17594613)
> fiddling with information _as such_ and in theory doesn't use up any energy.
that's not true at all. Any time you destroy information (for example an and gate can destroy information) you use energy.
Re:The Dark Silicon Problem and What It Means for CPU Design...
by Elrac on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @07:36AM
(#17600042)
Chances are you know more about this than I do, and I'd be interested to learn more.
If you're willing to explain, I wonder how an AND gate destroys information. Certainly the output of a 2-input AND gate carries less information than both inputs together. But unless the gate is destroying the input signals, which it isn't, I don't see how infomation is being destroyed.