News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by emsy on Sunday July 22, 2018 @03:29PM (#17588418)
Their motivations are irrelevant. Consumers aren't datacenters.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by TomMarius on Sunday July 22, 2018 @06:28PM (#17589244)
You know that companies deploy these processors as well, right? I just finished a deployment of 10k Intel i5 machines.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by emsy on Monday July 23, 2018 @06:45AM (#17591801)
And yet, customers still aren't datacenters, but still they carry the risks.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by TomMarius on Monday July 23, 2018 @09:07AM (#17592444)
I'm not talking about datacenters, I'm talking about workstations.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by emsy on Monday July 23, 2018 @12:08PM (#17593671)
In my reply, I used datacenters as a term to describe mass deployed computers (for which a ME actually makes sense). I’m sorry, I should’ve clarified.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by JumpCrisscross on Sunday July 22, 2018 @10:42PM (#17590217)
> Consumers aren't datacenters

Consumers have also shown zero intention of paying more for secure devices. Until we have a public ME hack with real consequences, I do not expect that to change.

Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by emsy on Monday July 23, 2018 @06:41AM (#17591793)
The funny thing is that making the processor more secure would require less work by not implementing a ME.
Re:Intel patches new ME vulnerabilities by daxorid on Monday July 23, 2018 @11:58AM (#17593611)
Demonstrably untrue. Consumers pay a premium for access to the Apple SEP and App Store review/analysis process (Jekyll and XCodeGhost notwithstanding, it's been a major security success)