News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by AngryData on Thursday July 19, 2018 @05:40PM (#17570547)
There are ways, piezoelectric devices can generate power off temperature differential. And mechanically you could put a stirling engine on although the torque and rotational force likely would not be ideal.
Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by HarryHirsch on Thursday July 19, 2018 @06:54PM (#17571063)
The Sodium Heat Engine is an ingenious device: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkali-metal_thermal_to_electr...

Best thing: no moving parts required!

Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by azernik on Thursday July 19, 2018 @06:05PM (#17570747)
Thermoelectric, not piezoelectric ^_^

WRT Stirling generators, there is already work ongoing for arrangement ssuitable to space applications, through new research on nuclear power sources (stirling radioisotope generators, and the Kilopower nuclear reactor). Generally the solution is to mount several Stirling generators such that their torques cancel each other out. Search for "managing the stroke of the pistons" at https://beyondnerva.wordpress.com/2017/11/19/krusty-first-of...

Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by jschwartzi on Thursday July 19, 2018 @06:35PM (#17570939)
That seems really complicated for something that the solar arrays do with no moving parts.
Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by greglindahl on Thursday July 19, 2018 @07:08PM (#17571144)
Note the quote from a while ago:

> They are mounted to motorized arms that will retract almost all of their surface behind the Thermal Protection System – the heat shield – when the spacecraft is close to the Sun.

Yes, there's a moving part. It only has to move twice (deploy, mostly retract) but it's still a moving part.

Re:Traveling to the Sun: Why Won't Parker Solar Probe Melt? by jschwartzi on Friday July 20, 2018 @10:23AM (#17575198)
A motor that predictably moves an object from one point to another can be much more reliable than an array of heat-driven reciprocating engines that have to be in constant motion and rely on conducting heat toward the internals of the spacecraft in order to function.