News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by pjc50 on Thursday July 19, 2018 @09:12AM (#17565882)
The logical next step then is drone strikes on US soil? I mean, why not? What's the legal difference?
Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by crankylinuxuser on Thursday July 19, 2018 @09:18AM (#17565947)
It wouldn't be the first time the US military has dropped bombs on its own citizens inside the USA.

https://rightsanddissent.org/news/may-13-1985-the-day-a-city...

Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by dekhn on Thursday July 19, 2018 @09:39AM (#17566137)
That was the city of Philadelphia, not the US military. Also, it was generally recognized as a completely unacceptable action. Don't try to pretend like that's evidence of some sort of ongoing US-military-bombing-US-citizens-on-US-soil, it's not.
Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by crankylinuxuser on Thursday July 19, 2018 @10:45AM (#17566757)
Because the police have sacks of C4 hanging around? That'd be a big fat no. They obtained essential support from the military.

And sure it was considered unconscionable. Who went to prison in the administration of the time? Hint: not the police, military, or politicians who ordered it.

There's also the case in which the Air Force bombed Tulsa. Still, more African Americans, so it wasn't really a big deal (notice a trend?).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot

Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by dekhn on Thursday July 19, 2018 @11:16AM (#17567087)
The supplies came from the FBI, not the military. FBI is civilian. Also, wrt the Tulsa race riot, it was individuals with personal aircraft, not the Air Force.

It's fine to be angry but not OK to twist basic facts.

Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by dragonwriter on Thursday July 19, 2018 @03:58PM (#17569728)
> The logical next step then is drone strikes on US soil? I mean, why not? What's the legal difference?

Because of the way the 9/11 AUMF is crafted, there's no legal difference, just as there would have been no legal difference between bombing Japanese forces in WWII that happened to be found on US soil and bombing then in Japan or some third country.

There are, however, practical and political differences, which is why, e.g. when German unlawful combatants were identified in the US in WWII (after two of them turned themselves in to the FBI, who they had trouble convincing of the reality of the situation, and fingered the rest of the group), the government didn't send an assault force and level the neighborhood, but instead the FBI picked them up (and then handed then over to the military.)

Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by nerdponx on Thursday July 19, 2018 @10:38AM (#17566685)
We'll see what happens when drones start showing up in militarized police department arsenals.
[dead]
Re:A Citizen Is Suing the US for Putting Him on the 'Kill List' by sitkack on Thursday July 19, 2018 @09:37AM (#17566115)