Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr...
by cageface on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @04:13PM
(#17561711)
Why would Google continue to license Android to Samsung when it can no longer make any revenue from Samsung phones? At that point it would only make sense for them to throw all their efforts into Pixel and catch up as best they can.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr...
by dvogel on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @04:28PM
(#17561801)
They would negotiate different licensing terms that require the licensee to risk their own capital on a bet that the consumer wants android devices with all of the associated Google services. That would be different from their current position of essentially paying for Google services with an in-kind payment of non-competition.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr...
by Anagmate on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @06:43PM
(#17562633)
> "buy only from us or never from us"
And? Seems like a valid move (from both moral and corporate perspective) to me.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr...
by kingbirdy on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @07:14PM
(#17562803)
If there are lots of people to buy from, that's a fair offer. If there's only one person to buy from (Google, in this case), that's not a fair offer, it's abusing your monopoly.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr...
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @11:59PM
(#17563856)
Interfering in your customers' dealings that have nothing to do with you sounds morally awful to me.
It's a plain and simple competition case where Google was exploiting its market position "buy only from us or never from us". Your scenario doesn't make any sense whatsoever. In fact Samsung can produce Tizen phones already and still does as it's not a competing Android.