News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zoox and Its $800M Robo Taxi Dream [video] by floatrock on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @09:42PM (#17555002)
Cool, sure, but when $800M of capital is on the line, why is it important?

Yeah, everyone who has putzed with robots gets a tingle of excitement when they build their first crab drive. It's neat, but also introduces a huge amount of complexity and probably maintenance wear on the tires from non-subdegree alignment at road speeds.

Tesla is struggling to mass produce electric-from-the-ground-up traditional front-wheel-steering-only powertrains. What's the use case for this degree of added complexity beyond some cute parallel parking?

Re:Zoox and Its $800M Robo Taxi Dream [video] by Fricken on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @02:06AM (#17555856)
You don't have to look beyond Elon Musk to see that the half-crazy ideas are the ones that get people excited. I've been following Zoox since it was literally just a guy with some concept art talking people up in hotel bars at tech conferences. It's in the article, why did Jesse Levinson, cream of the crop in robotics talent decide to go with Zoox and not Google? Because it's an opportunity to really innovate. Zoox has managed to get tons of great people on board for that reason alone.

Otherwise you're right, it's very much an open question as to whether they can make these radically different vehicles to automotive grade reliability.