Re:George Hotz is on a hacker crusade against the ‘scam’ of ...
by BugsJustFindMe on Friday July 13, 2018 @10:17PM
(#17528413)
It sounds to me like you don't understand how little performance you actually need for this kind of stuff. People have been writing effective autopilot software for decades using hardware that wasn't even particularly fast at the time and may as well be a pile of sand today. What exactly do you think that that code needs to do? I promise that Python on a new smartphone can do way more now than we could do 20 years ago on a Pentium in C or C++. You're lucky if any of your sensors emit at even 100Hz.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:George Hotz is on a hacker crusade against the ‘scam’ of ...
by Jack000 on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:59PM
(#17528734)
you can't do timing sensitive stuff without an RTOS, because resources could be preempted by the os or other applications.
it used to be that certain chipsets could do motor control by bitbanging the parallel port, but modern pcs/phones can no longer do this due to latency.
Re:George Hotz is on a hacker crusade against the ‘scam’ of ...
by maym86 on Friday July 13, 2018 @10:59PM
(#17528553)
I think OP's point is about the latency from all the layers. At 70 mph, where 100ms is 3m, this is a problem for a control system.
Re:George Hotz is on a hacker crusade against the ‘scam’ of ...
by commaai on Saturday July 14, 2018 @01:53AM
(#17529042)
Human latency is about 250ms.
Re:George Hotz is on a hacker crusade against the ‘scam’ of ...
by Jack000 on Saturday July 14, 2018 @07:45AM
(#17529930)
I think that's not a fair comparison - a digital control system needs much finer time slices to compete with human reaction time. A control system that worked off of webcam images at 4hz would be a jittery mess, or just very slow if using a Kalman filter.