Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by NullPrefix on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:11PM
(#17518655)
4 dimm requirement seems kind of asinine. Normal systems can boot and work fine with a single stick of ram.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by bhouston on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:13PM
(#17518665)
Well for high performance systems requiring 4 dimms isn't bad as the tr series has 4 memory controllers.
Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by tankenmate on Thursday July 12, 2018 @05:33PM
(#17518804)
You don't have to run with 4 DIMMs but you'll run slower if you do; it's kinda like having a one lane road vs a 4 lane road, you can put all your traffic through one lane, but it's a whole lot slower than using four lanes.
Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by NullPrefix on Thursday July 12, 2018 @06:57PM
(#17519311)
That was not the point I was arguing with. Let me qoute.
>AMD should have just not made TR work in this case
Where "this case" is <4 dimms.
Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by EvangelicalPig on Friday July 13, 2018 @11:05AM
(#17523514)
Does the equivalent Intel platform suffer to the same degree of performance degradation when not using all 4 memory channels?
Re:AMD EPYC Performance Testing with systemd
by tankenmate on Friday July 13, 2018 @01:04PM
(#17524686)
For the most part yes, the only sizeable difference is the caching/NUMA strategies and implementation between the two platforms (L3 <=> DRAM controller(s), and interconnects if necessary).