News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Napoleon as Organizational Designer (2009) [pdf] by pjc50 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @04:55AM (#17505441)
This is probably easier to follow if you have read Clausewitz, and understand the pressures pertaining to an on-foot army. E.g. the references to "foraging" would today probably be called "looting".

The central organisational challenge was: how to march 250,000 men on foot across a continent with no motor transport for supplies nor radio communications? It was more effective to spread out, but this required delegating authority down the hierarchy. Effectively the Grand Armee was a set of smaller micro-armies that allowed it to overcome the scaling challenge.

Re:Napoleon as Organizational Designer (2009) [pdf] by a_d on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @05:14AM (#17505517)
Adding more “micro army” pods would exponentially increase the coordination costs / communication overhead. If communication is the main challenge then decentralizing power would lead to more org ineffectiveness (centralized/command-control structures would be better).

Anyway, as I commented earlier: I think the authors miss the central innovation that enabled org innovation — which is all the tech Napoleon developed around messaging!

Re:Napoleon as Organizational Designer (2009) [pdf] by azernik on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @05:37AM (#17505596)
He also, however, managed to reduce the coordination costs by that eternal go-to - finding subordinates he could trust, who would grok his plans well enough to DTRT even without a lot of communication. The Napoleonic armies had an enormous number of talented generals aside from the Great Man himself.