Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by toomanybeersies on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:22AM
(#17504462)
AMP doesn't render properly for us not on our phones.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by a1369209993 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:48AM
(#17504527)
Both versions render okay for me (firefox), although the non-AMP version is scrunched into a newpaper column that only uses half the window width; do you have noscript disabled?
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by ars on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:39AM
(#17504509)
It worked fine here, on Firefox desktop.
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by gcb0 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:47AM
(#17504525)
good for you, running javascript everywhere.
With adblocker, or uMatrix, or noScript, etc, you have to white-list each site. Trivial but annoying.
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by ars on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @02:54AM
(#17504953)
> good for you, running javascript everywhere.
I'm not. I have noscript installed. I whitelist certain things, plus anything run by the site itself (which is automatic, I don't have to configure it per-site).
I rarely have to change it anymore.
Re:Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V site after own staff revolt
by a1369209993 on Wednesday July 11, 2018 @12:52AM
(#17504537)
Why would you whitelist a rag^Wnews site like theregister.co.uk?