Re:The soccer ball that survived the Challenger explosion
by askvictor on Monday July 02, 2018 @07:26PM
(#17446216)
I'm no rocket scientist either, but happened to be reading in depth about SRBs in general and Challenger in particular, and my understanding is: the joint in question was a field joint, to be assembled in the field, as opposed to factory joints which were assembled in the factory. The construction of these joints were different (asbestos insulation vs O-rings). The differing design is due to transportation and logistics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.