Re:The Matrix Calculus You Need for Deep Learning
by Myrmornis on Sunday July 01, 2018 @02:36AM
(#17434412)
We’re saying much the same thing, it’s just that I find your and GP’s use of the absolute “pretty awful” to be hyperbolic and something of a loss of perspective. Remember what we have here: a free, actively maintained, accurate, comprehensive and advanced corpus of expository writing on mathematics. Adjectives that are missing there are “intuitition-rich”, and “helpful for undergraduates”. I do understand if you are disappointed with it. As noted, I (undergrad level) don’t approach it with an expectation that it will be my favorite reading on a topic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Matrix Calculus You Need for Deep Learning
by pvg on Monday July 02, 2018 @10:03AM
(#17441685)
We’re saying much the same thing
No.
something of a loss of perspective.
You'd have to provide some alternative perspective or argument that goes beyond 'pretty awful sounds kinda mean'.
Remember what we have here: a free, actively maintained, accurate, comprehensive and advanced corpus of expository writing on mathematics
We already have a few of those. As I mentioned, mathworld is far better at this and it's been around longer than Wikipedia.