News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by brlewis on Thursday September 30, 2010 @10:46AM (#1743413)
That's no conspiracy theory. A conspiracy involves secret collaboration.

The well-known negotiation technique of anchoring is all that theory is. It seems plausible to me.

Re:Wiretapping the Internet by awakeasleep on Thursday September 30, 2010 @11:08AM (#1743489)
Do you have any idea where it could be leading? I've been thinking about it on and off for the past few days but nothing comes to mind, I don't have enough context to form any opinion.

I'd sure love to hear what Schneier thinks about it.

Re:Wiretapping the Internet by brlewis on Thursday September 30, 2010 @01:24PM (#1744054)
I don't know where it's leading, or if it's even leading anywhere. For some people, gaining power over others is an end unto itself, not a means leading to some other end.
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by awakeasleep on Thursday September 30, 2010 @02:03PM (#1744187)
I meant, what 'reasonable' thing will our gvernment ask for after being rebuked for this outrageous request
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by andreyf on Thursday September 30, 2010 @12:22PM (#1743780)
Anchoring involves defining the value of something where it was previously undefined. What you describe is simply an extreme initial offer. You're right that it isn't necessarily sinister.
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by brlewis on Thursday September 30, 2010 @01:22PM (#1744047)
An extreme initial offer manipulates the "anchoring and adjustment heuristic" defined at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by josh33 on Thursday September 30, 2010 @08:42PM (#1745485)
The Overton Window Concept is a potential anchoring case for this law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
Re:Wiretapping the Internet by dasil003 on Thursday September 30, 2010 @02:57PM (#1744394)
One might even say collusion ;)