I've personally found that a lot of Go's marketing is, if not misleading, outright false. As an example: https://blog.plan99.net/modern-garbage-collection-911ef4f8bd...
Beware trading a visible cost for an unbounded number of smaller costs. In Go's case, in return for minimal pausing you get memory fragmentation, terrible performance if the GC is ever seriously taxed, and a 100% (!) heap memory use overhead. If you're just writing commandline daemons or servers you restart every ten minutes though, who cares?
Go doesn't come off too badly in this because it's not Java, which allocates like crazy. That's a laudable tradeoff, but that does not mean they solved garbage collection very well.
All they want is ruby with static types, that runs fast. Those things will satisfy them alone.
Intelligently written C/C++/D/Zig/Rust will always knock Crystal out of the park. :(
What other languages? Because the language uses "Fast as C" as part of it's tagline. Is this a false claim?