News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A cheap way of storing information in DNA by moyix on Friday June 29, 2018 @06:14AM (#17423593)
> still costs ~1000USD to read the ~ 1Gigabyte human genome

This piece is dropping fast though; Dante Labs will currently do it (with 30X coverage) for individuals for $500 [1]. And I believe the price for labs that do a lot of sequencing is significantly lower per-genome.

Writing is still a much bigger challenge, though. Writing something the size of the human genome is currently considered a "grand challenge" and is being tackled by HGP-Write:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_Project-Write#Human_Gen...

[1] https://us.dantelabs.com/products/whole-genome-sequencing-wg...

Re:A cheap way of storing information in DNA by xevb3k on Friday June 29, 2018 @06:27AM (#17423646)
That’s an impressive price, do you know anyone who’s done it? I’d be interested in knowing what the experience was like.

Illumina appear to be targeting 100USD right now. I think their markup on reagents is probably at least x10...

But even that’s super expensive compared to reading data from a HD... so you have to wonder where DNA as storage is viable. Unless a vastly cheaper read method becomes available.

Re:A cheap way of storing information in DNA by moyix on Friday June 29, 2018 @06:36AM (#17423680)
I don't know anyone who's done it (it's still a bit too expensive for me to give it a shot) but it appears to be a fairly standard saliva sample kit that you mail in.

Yes compared to HDD it's way too expensive to read. However tape backups are also cumbersome and time-consuming to use, but the fact that you can get extremely cheap bulk storage from them means lots of big companies still use them. So I could see it maybe being competitive there (eventually).

Re:A cheap way of storing information in DNA by vedtopkar on Friday June 29, 2018 @06:19AM (#17423616)
Wow, this is the first I'm hearing of Dante Labs. That price point for 30X WGS coverage is seriously impressive.
Re:A cheap way of storing information in DNA by adenadel on Friday June 29, 2018 @11:31AM (#17425077)
They are just using Illumina sequencers so they are simply taking a loss on each test.