Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ...
by lujim on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:40PM
(#17418939)
Fair jab. My point was that the Search & Rescue "pay to play" model seems unreasonable. It was originally intended to be used in cases of negligence/recklessness but is apparently being used in plain vanilla S&R activities somewhat randomly based on the whims of local authorities.
The case I'm talking about was similar to this article. S&R possible overreacted and charged a guy $9000+. There was no danger, just a miscommunication. That seems similar to this article where a guy got a minor scrape on his head from tipping over his motorcycle and an entire Trauma team was readied unbeknownst to him. Yet he still got the bill.
Very well, in accordance with your wishes, we'll let you die in the wilderness in order to save you $10,000.