News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by hsienmaneja on Thursday June 28, 2018 @11:45AM (#17417851)
America is a wonderful place to be rich or wealthy. Medical concerns are a top reason for personal bankruptcy.
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by akeck on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:08PM (#17418682)
This type of billing is probably not helping the US birthrate, which I believe is now below replacement.
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by typetehcodez on Thursday June 28, 2018 @11:03AM (#17417423)
As long as consumers follow along, this will not change. We've allowed the US healthcare system to become a toxic cesspool of greedy insurance companies with laughable and corrupt government oversight. IMHO, The only way this changes is if everyone stops paying.
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by arnarbi on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:02PM (#17418623)
As a consumer, how do I not follow along? I can't just stop using healthcare for my family.

I feel like I must accept this scam because it's the lesser evil.

This exists only because of the lobbyist system of government, where consumer's voice is easily drowned by money.

Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by pavel_lishin on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:05PM (#17418654)
> IMHO, The only way this changes is if everyone stops paying.

Great! I'll start the next time I need a medical procedure. Of course, this protest will get only more and more effective - once my bill is sent to collections, and I'm forced into bankruptcy and become homeless, I'll amass all sorts of medical maladies!

Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by lujim on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:54PM (#17419056)
The reply next yours says the same thing without the toxic feel that makes the internet a slightly worse place for everyone. Go out in that big world and find something that makes you a happier person.
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by pavel_lishin on Thursday June 28, 2018 @02:46PM (#17419426)
You're right. Today's been a rough day, and I keep trying to tell myself that if I don't have anything constructive to say, I shouldn't say anything at all - but I can't seem to listen :/
Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by lujim on Thursday June 28, 2018 @12:24PM (#17418246)
Wow. Now imagine you were hiking in the mountains, you break your ankle, and need the help of search and rescue to get out of there. After you get a $15,000 bill for a Trauma fee from the hospital you get a $10,000 bill for a search and rescue fee from the state. Yes it's the Ticket Master business model.

If anyone hears that I'm missing in a forest somewhere, please do me a favor and don't call anybody.

Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by pavel_lishin on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:04PM (#17418639)
> If anyone hears that I'm missing in a forest somewhere, please do me a favor and don't call anybody.

Very well, in accordance with your wishes, we'll let you die in the wilderness in order to save you $10,000.

Re:ER bills: A baby was treated with a nap. His parents got ... by lujim on Thursday June 28, 2018 @01:40PM (#17418939)
Fair jab. My point was that the Search & Rescue "pay to play" model seems unreasonable. It was originally intended to be used in cases of negligence/recklessness but is apparently being used in plain vanilla S&R activities somewhat randomly based on the whims of local authorities.

The case I'm talking about was similar to this article. S&R possible overreacted and charged a guy $9000+. There was no danger, just a miscommunication. That seems similar to this article where a guy got a minor scrape on his head from tipping over his motorcycle and an entire Trauma team was readied unbeknownst to him. Yet he still got the bill.