Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by gsibble on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @03:36AM (#17406398)

B2 has 99.999999% durability

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by scarface74 on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @07:34AM (#17407344)

That’s nice in theory, but if B2 has a castrophic disaster in thier one data center, that durability goes to zero.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by snvzz on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @03:56AM (#17406488)

That's just 8 9s. S3 has 11 9s.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by gsibble on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @04:00AM (#17406504)

Depends upon your client SLA then. You can also store the file twice on B2 for still less than the cost of S3 :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by kccqzy on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @04:33AM (#17406634)

Will failures be correlated then?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: B2blaze – A Backblaze B2 library for Python by snvzz on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @02:57PM (#17410791)

Then you should be comparing it to reduced redundancy S3, which is cheaper than regular S3.

[ Parent | on HN ]