Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by dangrossman on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @04:15PM
(#1740976)
Banks still like them, for some reason. Merchant accounts always ask for chargeback rebuttals by fax.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by pak on Monday October 04, 2010 @01:40AM
(#1754715)
Because it still isn't trivial to hook up a machine to a jack and send documents to other people with one button press. (Try setting up a copier that is supposed to email PDF's over the LAN and see what I mean. It's at least 10x more complicated to get working.)
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by wazoox on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @03:39PM
(#1740815)
They certainly are obsolete. I'm nearly 40 and I managed to send no more than 2 faxes in my whole professional life. I don't seem to having done it once in the past 8 years.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by danpker on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @04:55PM
(#1741116)
They're definitely not obsolete, at least outside of technology companies. Many businesses use a fax machine on a daily basis to send documents and order forms, as it's much easier than scanning things and then emailing them.
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by sachitgupta on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @04:00PM
(#1740906)
Even when I do, I end up using an online service like http://www.hellofax.com/. Works really well!
Re:Scott Adams: Wireless Voice Calls are Obsolete
by joe_the_user on Wednesday September 29, 2010 @06:09PM
(#1741328)
Why aren't faxes obsolete?
They are.
The new, advanced use for your old fax line is as a platform for the new, dedicated POTS voice lines that are coming in to obsolete your unreliable legacy mobile phone...
(this is Scott Adams, after all)
Why aren't faxes obsolete? Over 10 years since President Clinton e-signed the e-signature law into place. About 150 years since the first e-signature (over telegraph). Seems like an opportunity missed here.