News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toward a Mature Science of Consciousness by AstralStorm on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @01:49PM (#17402650)
You could probably use few more specific words to a greater effect. Such as self-model, world model, memory, information processing, directed action, responsiveness. Consciousness is a bit too underdefined a word. It is probably not as much of a whole as a tree or human as an organism is - it is not even persistent nor stable - and leaves no persistent traces in the world.

You don't get a consciousness carcass left behind or a "monad" as some current theorists postulated. At least we haven't found any.

Re:Toward a Mature Science of Consciousness by hackinthebochs on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @02:57PM (#17403164)
But consciousness picks out something different from self-model, world model, information processing, etc. That is to say, none of these things sufficiently describes the processes we refer to when we talk about consciousness. A replacement concept would need to capture everything real about the term. We can replace water with H2O in any context and it makes sense. But there are contexts where we can meaningfully speak of consciousness where self-model (apparently) doesn't completely fit, e.g. "the pain of my stubbed toe overwhelmed my conscious experience".
Re:Toward a Mature Science of Consciousness by AstralStorm on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @12:18PM (#17409401)
Replace by "overrode my decision capability" (meaning you cannot act beyond reflex) or "overran my symbolic capability" (it was so big you cannot describe it) or perhaps overrode your other senses (couldn't sense anything else physically) or perhaps "stopped your self model from updating" (blocked integration of other perceptions).

Better? Definitely less poetic but perhaps more accurate.