News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by sschueller on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @06:32AM (#17399351)
I think this is a good step but what a lot of countries lack is also proper disposal of trash.

Landfills are a poor solution, better are clean trash burning facilities[1] that also produce energy as well as proper pre sorting.

China is building the largest in the world which is to open in 2020. [2]

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/science/earth/13trash.htm...

[2] https://www.sciencealert.com/china-is-building-the-largest-w...

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by protonfish on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @08:19AM (#17399915)
The "ban single-use plastic" hype train seems illogical to me. Having your city littered with garbage is a government services problem - they should provide convenient waste disposal receptacles, empty them frequently to be disposed of properly, and give citations to litterers. We should not be cheering this short-sighted law.

I also don't understand why plastic in a landfill is all that bad. The fact that it is biodegradable is a positive here - it won't break down into toxic substances.

Evaluating environmental impact is a complex process. Everything we do has multiple consequences. I believe global warning is the most serious environmental disaster we are facing today. Plastics use significantly less energy in production and transportation (because of lower weight and less material needed.) With an eye toward AGW, how can paper packaging and burning refuse be seen as a responsible choice?

It is critical that we consider the effects of our consumption habits in a serious and reasonable fashion. I just don't see the anti-plastic panic to be rational or constructive.

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by seszett on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @08:51AM (#17400129)
> With an eye toward AGW, how can paper packaging and burning refuse be seen as a responsible choice?

Plastic takes oil and therefore carbon out of the depths of the Earth, until it eventually gets burnt, biodegrades or otherwise degrades and turns into CO2 contributing to global warming.

Trees instead take CO2 from the atmosphere, turn it into solid cellulose that we make paper from, until the paper biodegrades or gets burnt and returns to the atmosphere from which it came in the first place. If a new tree is planted for each tree that gets cut for paper, as is done in most developed countries, paper can be carbon neutral (it all depends on the source of the energy used for processing it).

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by AjithAntony on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @03:35PM (#17403414)
Plastic is a nearly free byproduct of refining oil for fuel.
Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by thinkcontext on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @09:05AM (#17400236)
City services are expensive, why spend more money picking up trash, cleaning waterways, unclogging sewers, etc when you can do less of that? Particularly in developing countries which have scarce resources.

My city (Washington, DC) opted for a 5 cent tax on plastic bags. This caused use of them to drop 80% and been considered a huge success.

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by thecrazyone on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @01:48AM (#17406031)
Because demand for plastic bags or similar substances doesn't evaporate. You're using a different substance instead of plastic, if you ban it. Using paper implies cutting down more trees, and paper doesn't have all the awesome properties that plastic has: high tensile strength per weight, impermeable to air/moisture, lightweight, etc.
Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by thinkcontext on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @12:40PM (#17409603)
Plastic bags are still available, they just cost a nickel now. I can't say I've noticed any more paper bags around, can't think of a store I shop at regularly where they are even available. I believe people are using reusable bags instead.
Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by justin66 on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @12:54PM (#17409759)
> The fact that it is biodegradable

...is something you just made up.

Most plastics aren't, and some of the ones that are marketed as biodegradable need to be put in a high-temperature bioreactor or something equally ridiculous in order to break down in a useful timeframe.

> I also don't understand why plastic in a landfill is all that bad.

Some portion of everything placed in a landfill will get in the water, but this is particularly true of lightweight and slow-to-degrade plastics.

> Plastics use significantly less energy in production and transportation ... With an eye toward AGW, how can paper packaging and burning refuse be seen as a responsible choice?

Incinerating garbage is an energy source in places like Norway.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jun/14/norway-w...

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by tushartyagi on Wednesday June 27, 2018 @02:13AM (#17406101)
> The fact that it is biodegradable is a positive here - it won't break down into toxic substances.

The problem is that most of these biodegradables take a few years to fully break down, which is slower than the amount we keep on adding garbage in the landfills. So it's a net positive inflow into the landfills.

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by JoeAltmaier on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @08:22AM (#17399932)
Its less cheap (in energy and environmental impact) if people have to run around and empty receptacles multiple times a day to keep up with the water bottles.

Remember, everything we do has multiple consequences.

Re:Mumbai bans plastic bags, bottles, and single-use plastic... by sschueller on Tuesday June 26, 2018 @08:47AM (#17400104)
A landfill is open and birds etc will take items out of it.