No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by iainmerrick on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @06:24PM (#17360387)

At least the other link was a clear, well-written, well-reasoned article. I have no idea what this one is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by PlanarFreak on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @06:45PM (#17360547)

I'm with you on this one. I enjoyed reading the arp242 article, but this one's like a bad meme - an incomprehensible mish-mash of links and emojis.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by seandougall on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @07:06PM (#17360704)

Not to mention fatal JS errors on mobile.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by ghuntley on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @06:34PM (#17360469)

It's a silly rant about feelings. Spin up a decent sized Kubernetes cluster or use CloudFormation and please report back how you feel 6 months later.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by iainmerrick on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @07:41PM (#17360904)

Kubernetes grew out of Borg, right?

Ever use borgcfg?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by ghuntley on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @09:12PM (#17361269)

Nah. Can you reference any public examples of an example cfg out in the wild?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No: Body: Wants: To: Write: – YAML by iainmerrick on Thursday June 21, 2018 @02:43AM (#17362689)

The first google hit I get is a presentation that includes a very small config sample: http://www.hpts.ws/papers/2015/wilkes.pdf

The second hit is a google+ post wailing “arrrrgh, somebody reinvented borgcfg for Kubernetes” :)

I’m guessing the switch to YAML, even though it might be a bit tedious, was an explicit reaction to the fact that the ultra-programmable borgcfg turned out to cause some big headaches.

[ Parent | on HN ]