News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by hartator on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:05PM (#17356636)
> GDPR is a good example of another law which is potentially dangerous. However, I do see that it's hard to comply with both, but I don't see how they interact with other.

The copyright law requires you to store metadata about the user who publish content forever while GDPR forbids you to do so.

> Why?

I would say most of HN leans left not libertarian.

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by detaro on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:08PM (#17356669)
> The copyright law requires you to store metadata about the user who publish content forever

Then GDPR does not forbid you to do so, Article 6.1 c)

> 1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

> [...]

> c) processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject;

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by sebst on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:09PM (#17356676)
> The copyright law requires you to store metadata about the user who publish content forever while GDPR forbids you to do so.

GDPR allows you to do so, if there is a requirement. Complying with another law is certainly a reasonable requirement. That's also why you're "allowed" to keep your invoices for ten years, because you're "required" to do so.

> I would say most of HN leans left not libertarian.

This might be true, might be false. A good discussion should incorporate different views. And back to topic: I firmly believe this law to be dangerous by itself and not because there is a (more or less) applicable quote by a controversial writer.

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by hartator on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:49PM (#17357054)
> GDPR allows you to do so, if there is a requirement. Complying with another law is certainly a reasonable requirement. That's also why you're "allowed" to keep your invoices for ten years, because you're "required" to do so.

True. Your quote from Ayn Rand was actually a reaction from 2 characters discussing how one law make it not possible to respect another. GDPR does make it more complex, and one can argue copyright is not a subject that should infringe privacy. It’s up to debate. Debate that US based startups won’t need to have if they don’t want to.

And it was more a Kudos to quoting Ayn Rand and an upvote!

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by AsyncAwait on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:37PM (#17356948)
Libertarian doesn't mean "right-wing", it just was co-opted as such, in fact there are many left-wing libertarians.
Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by michaelmrose on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @02:53PM (#17358510)
Many as in 2%?

There are certainly some ideas of merit but supporting politicians that push it seems to inevitably involve benefiting the right who is pushing for many agendas that will personally damage me and mine so I cannot in good conscience do so.

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by AsyncAwait on Thursday June 21, 2018 @04:03AM (#17363032)
In Europe, it's many, in the U.S. not so much. That's why most politicians you see are of the right-wing variety.

And you seem to be misunderstanding. Left-wing libertarians do not have the same set of ideas as the right-wing ones, you seem to think that there is "libertarianism" and that I am saying that some on the left also stand for those ideas that those on the right, (the only real area of agreement is an anti-war stance).

Left libertarianism is mostly about personal freedom, as opposed to authoritarianism, while still being in favor of social programs, oppose privatization of public services etc. You should read up on it.

See also [1].

"In the United States, the word "libertarian" has become associated with right-libertarianism after Murray Rothbard and Karl Hess reached out to the New Left in the 1960s.[7] However, until then political usage of the word was associated exclusively with anti-capitalism and in most parts of the world such an association still predominates."

1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by MistahKoala on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @02:32PM (#17358255)
And libertarians aren't necessarily or typically objectivists.
Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by trisiak on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:11PM (#17356706)
Libertarianism is orthogonal to left-right split.

https://www.politicalcompass.org/

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by Bakary on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @05:59PM (#17360197)
It seems the left-leaning flavor is rarely seen in online commentary or among the tech moguls who openly embrace libertarianism.
Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by gameswithgo on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @04:11PM (#17359270)
libertarianism is whatever it needs to be to win the argument at hand.

it means about as much as "scripting language" or "strongly typed"

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by tripzilch on Thursday June 21, 2018 @07:34AM (#17364090)
... did you just call libertarians weakly typed??

Also, now I want to write a framework called "libtarianism" that includes a pseudo rand generator.

Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by ravenstine on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @12:21PM (#17356797)
True, but a lot of people do not see it that way. (although that's partly due to prominent Republicans hitching a ride on the Libertarian wagon when it's convenient)
Re:European parliament committee approves vote on ‘disastrou... by dfxm12 on Wednesday June 20, 2018 @01:51PM (#17357782)
I would say most of HN leans left not libertarian.

I would've thought so too, until I looked at discussions about unions on here.