His complaints are heavily focused on how the company had a shit culture and terrible scientific practices. But he doesn't describe it, from the inside, as being the total scam that it looks like from the outside:

> If they had used some of the more sensitive methods or invented a new method they probably could have made some, but not all assays work.

> Part of the problem was that they surrounded themselves with people who told them what they wanted to hear. Ultimately, even if they hired the right people from the get go, and those people pushed for other methods they didn't like, they would have been marginalized, pushed out and replaced by people who were "yes" people.