Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by falcolas on Sunday June 17, 2018 @09:35AM
(#17332310)
I would think that, given the capability to have light after the sun has gone down for hundreds of generations (candles have been around for ~5,000 years), any such trait would have become much more than an outlier by now.
Even if it is a positive evolutionary trait, that doesn't help anybody today. The 4 hour sleepers are still outliers, and the rest of us still need that sleep to operate at full capability.
Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by eanzenberg on Sunday June 17, 2018 @10:35AM
(#17332520)
I wouldn’t be surprised if needing more sleep is a competitive advantage. Increased brain activity leads to increased garbage collection and resetting.
Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by amelius on Sunday June 17, 2018 @10:58AM
(#17332621)
Perhaps the short-sleepers have a concurrent garbage collector ;)
Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by AstralStorm on Sunday June 17, 2018 @01:33PM
(#17333322)
Or just more garbage. The trait might not really be adaptive - the cost might be worse memory for example.
Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by pacaro on Sunday June 17, 2018 @02:42PM
(#17333633)
Anecdote time. I know one person who matches the description of someone with the gene for not needing sleep. He’s an extremely high functioning individual.
Re:Eight hours a night isn’t enough, according to a leading ...
by rmgraham on Tuesday June 19, 2018 @01:33AM
(#17344067)
Seconded. The only person I know who sleeps like this is also the highest functioning person I know.
Or you could look at them as people at the forefront of evolution, leading us to a future where we need less sleep.