News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:For $1B, Elon Musk’s Tunnel to O’Hare Would Be a Miracle by mlindner on Friday June 15, 2018 @09:35PM (#17325257)
If it's so profitable then why didn't any other companies set up a competing line in the first place? The perversion happened long ago if the city prevented any competition from stepping in before the city finally decided to move.

In general companies are faster movers than governments in these types of things. If that didn't happen then something prevented them from being able to do so.

The corrupted politicians are to blame here for blocking other companies from competing, not the business.

Re:For $1B, Elon Musk’s Tunnel to O’Hare Would Be a Miracle by cornholio on Saturday June 16, 2018 @02:48AM (#17326261)
The private sector is not a fast mover in infrastructure. It's the prototype public good, where the gains are vastly redistributed to society rather than being easy to isolate into a transaction. A road not only reduces your travel time from point A to B, a service worth $C to you. But also enables economic activity along it's path, makes it possible for you to get a job in B in the first place, etc. and all these are worth a large multiple (N * $C) for which nobody can be charged.

The net effect is that there is drastic under-investment from the private sector compared to the needs or the economic potential of a society with good infrastructure.

Re:For $1B, Elon Musk’s Tunnel to O’Hare Would Be a Miracle by peatmoss on Friday June 15, 2018 @11:12PM (#17325601)
Generally cities prevent people from building infrastructure willy nilly. Buldozing houses or seizing public land for a new highway isn’t something that companies are allowed to do... I’d posit for good reason.

Typically P3 agreements are initiated by government and promised revenue exclusivity is the incentive to build.