Re:Codemasters History: The NES’ Best Unlicensed Developer
by superflyguy on Friday June 15, 2018 @02:50PM
(#17322431)
Nintendo sued them for bypassing their protection. Often people caved; Nintendo/Sega controlled how many games a developer could get published; the genre etc. Codemasters was like "yeah, right" and reversed engineered it, and got sued. Apparently they thought they were going to lose and agreed with Codemasters to call off the lawsuit as long as Codemasters maintained publicly that they had done a deal with Nintendo to end the case.
Source: common knowledge in the small West England game dev community.
Re:Codemasters History: The NES’ Best Unlicensed Developer
by teuobk on Friday June 15, 2018 @04:35PM
(#17323325)
Nintendo also sued Galoob over the Game Genie, which Galoob had licensed (purchased?) from Codemasters. Nintendo lost, and then they lost again on appeal. The issue was whether the Game Genie created derivative works.
Re:Codemasters History: The NES’ Best Unlicensed Developer
by audiolion on Friday June 15, 2018 @03:25PM
(#17322731)
I read Console Wars and it was a really insightful look into how Nintendo and Sega came to be and how they operated if you are interested in this sort of thing.
Source: common knowledge in the small West England game dev community.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Galoob_Toys,_Inc._v._Nin....
https://mobile.audible.com/pd/Science-Technology/Console-War...
Konami got around this another way, by creating a shell company (Ultra Games in the US, Palcom Software in Europe/UK) that obtained its own license.
http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2017/05/feature_the_making_...
I remember the joy of accidentally having your band endorse a campaign to euthanise OAPs. Fun times.