Re:Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Tr...
by simonh on Thursday June 14, 2018 @09:36AM
(#17311546)
Others weren't doing the same, because they very specifically claimed that doing it at all was flat out technically impossible, so they didn't even consider looking at the economics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Tr...
by buvanshak on Thursday June 14, 2018 @10:21AM
(#17311861)
>because they very specifically claimed that doing it at all was flat out technically impossible
They claimed what was technically impossible?
Re:Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Tr...
by simonh on Thursday June 14, 2018 @08:16PM
(#17316474)
Landing and reusing the first stage booster. This is why Vulcan is designed to only recover the engines, because recovering the whole booster while still launching a useful payload was thought to be impossible. It was thought that the stresses of re-entry would be too severe without excessive weight increases and that it would not be possible to retain enough fuel for a propulsive landing.
Re:Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Tr...
by buvanshak on Thursday June 14, 2018 @09:55PM
(#17316942)
>It was thought that..
Do you have a citation for that?
Re:Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Tr...
by kamaal on Friday June 15, 2018 @05:20AM
(#17318494)
Yes, its called 'action throughout history'.
These things have existed for a century now. The fact that no one tried and it took a person with money from early dot com start up exit means others goofed up enormously.
Anybody could have tried. They didn't. Pulling down other peoples achievements because one didn't try the obvious themselves already reeks of envy.