Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by bthrm on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @06:50PM
(#17307681)
So it’s not “a librarian”, but someone with lots of money, education, connections, time...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by jessamyn on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @07:39PM
(#17307982)
Sometimes librarians are also those things.
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by paulcole on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @10:36PM
(#17308821)
Thank you for your work at Metafilter. Can’t believe I’ve been reading it for like 17 years now. Over half my life!
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by bthrm on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @08:12PM
(#17308171)
The title makes it sound like she’s some random Joe. Random Joes don’t have Wikipedia entries.
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by saudioger on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @09:46PM
(#17308623)
Average Joe has one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_Joe
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by beart on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @08:22PM
(#17308215)
You are replying to said librarian, fyi.
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by dahart on Wednesday June 13, 2018 @08:32PM
(#17308269)
Jessamyn isn’t a random Joe. But any random Joe can in fact make a Wikipedia entry, as long as it comes with verifiable facts, that’s kind of the point of Wikipedia.
There are almost a million pages for living people, according to this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Living_people They’re not all famous, they just usually have publications by them or about them.
Re:Librarian wins surprise judgement against Equifax in smal...
by icebraining on Thursday June 14, 2018 @08:52AM
(#17311247)
That's what I wish Wikipedia was, but unfortunately it's not so: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people...