News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by kristianp on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @08:14PM (#17299222)
Why do they need expensive Power 9s when the bulk of the processing is done by GPUs?
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by quadruplebond on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @10:13PM (#17299733)
Partly because we don’t want to be locked into using Intel for both of DOE’s open science machines. In the lead up to the exascale or near exascale machines (2012-now) I don’t remember hearing much about AMD, so presumably Intel and IBM were the only vendors supplying general purpose CPUs.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by bryanlarsen on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @08:17PM (#17299235)
Because Power 9's have on-chip NVLink ports.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by JohannFlobuster on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @08:35PM (#17299313)
This. CPUs are hungry.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by crb002 on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @09:00PM (#17299423)
Because all the Blue Gene/L/P/Q code is POWER.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by quadruplebond on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @10:10PM (#17299717)
Sort of, but Blue Gene tech was always an Argonne thing, Oak Ridge has been the one doing GPUs for awhile now. Unless something weird happens Argonne and Oak Ridge will always be running different types of computer since we don’t want to be locked into one specific vendor or hardware configuration.
Re:Summit Supercomputer Up and Running, Claims First Exascal... by eslaught on Tuesday June 12, 2018 @11:46PM (#17300081)
Aren't all the new DOE machines GPU at this point? I understand A21 and NERSC9 both are, though the vendor isn't announced yet as far as I'm aware.