News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

JohannFlobuster

Re:“The Riemann Hypothesis” by Michael Atiyah – Preprint on Monday September 24, 2018 @02:03AM (#18055369)
At the end, he basically says it isn't done, nor a formal proof of RH over Q. Secondly, he thinks RH is undecidable in the Godel sense, and I completely agree.

I studied the RH for my Senior Thesis and Godel completeness makes tons of sense here.

In terms of the proof, Proof by contraction has always felt like it yields short proofs. The beauty is the in the assumption and the tools afterwards.

In fact, the more I read the proof, the more beautiful I find the construction to be. Everything falls out. Thats why its so short.

This Todd Function I've never heard of so I need to do some reading.

Seems pretty legit to me but, you need alot of understanding here.

Source: I have a masters in Math and have studied the RH in depth during those studies.

Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @09:17PM (#17938837)
Ive had a few customers test AMD and found a higher operating temp and determined it was due to higher power consumption. On paper, you get more lanes at a lower TDP w/ AMD. In practice, as always, your results may vary. Test!

PCIe lanes and counting them is funny math. Do the homework on system boards, how they communicate, and the tax of moving information between processors.

However, I would say their tests were short, and AMD processors have 3 power operating modes. There was also a neat blog posted somewhere (I think on here...) a little while back suggesting that the AMD proc did not need to run at advertised power on the customer procs. It was about compile times and how much power still resulted in good times. That was consumer-grade Ryzen chips tested though.

Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @06:46PM (#17938234)
SGI stuff is already rebranded to the apollo name and Superdome Flex (UV300 I think it was before)

Depending on your SGI server, the name may have gone into the appropriate HPE family name.

If you need help with our new decoder ring, I'd be happy to point you in the right direction.

I expect HPC workloads to take advantage of AMD chips, but I do expect many of the mathematical improvements that the Skylake instruction set provides to amplify desire in the computational HPC/numerical computation/ non-GPU stuff.

Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @06:44PM (#17938226)
I hate doing this, but because this is sensitive, I have copy pasta-d the HPE Customer statement from our Customer Presentation on the issue:

HPE, along with all other server vendors, is starting to see supply constraints on various Intel Xeon-SP processors—commonly referred to as Skylake—used in our Gen10 servers.

–Intel is supply tight on Skylake SP HCC, Skylake SP LCC, Skylake SP XCC, and Skylake W LCC processor series.

–Customer demand for various Skylake server processors is exceeding short-term supply.

–Intel is working diligently to increase supply but indicates limited ability to materially improve Skylake availability potentially through December 2018.

Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @06:38PM (#17938194)
I'd love to know your results privately if you would share, as I have several customers who were impacted by Spectre/Meltdown and are also doing private benchmarks.
Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @06:37PM (#17938191)
Depends on market segement. I've seen alot of demand for Epyc in workloads that are sensitive to memory bandwidth. Just so much to offer when you max out 8 channels.

They are cheaper due to fabrication process. The PCIe lane story is stuff of fanboys. It comes at a cost, power and heat.

Secondly, anyone looking at an NVMe box should be looking at AMD in my opinion. The trick is if you are doing a VM farm, mixing Intel and AMD aint the best idea, as you all know.

I see EPYC ticking up fast.

In terms of exploits like Spectre/Meltdown, I'm pretty sure the exploits AMD claimed were not vulnerable, they ended up pushing out microcode for anyway. So its a moot point.

I HAVE come across alot of customers who have DOUBLED their core count due to Spectre/Meltdown mitigations, and they are attracted to AMDs, high core, lower cost options. But remember, the power draw is different and always test/PoC!

Re:Intel can’t supply 14nm Xeons, HPE recommends AMD Epyc on Friday September 07, 2018 @04:57PM (#17937579)
HPE Solution Architect here -- HPE has 4 lines, 3 public / 1 private. DL385 and DL325 are rack based servers aka traditional pizza box.

DL385 is your workhorse platform. DL325 is a 1P design based for heavy PCIe connected (read: NVMe) devices.

The CL3150 is a cloudline server and will likely be more consumed in the service provider space, in my opinion.

The Apollo 35 is available to top 200 volume accounts (which has been annouced publicly, but is not available to your everyday customer.)

This type [of information leak] is my worst nightmare as someone who works with resellers, letting these types of documents in the wrong hands or somehow access is breached like this.

Edit 2: I am a server SA, MASE. I configure servers all the time. If customer demand shows the swap, you could see the proc move over to other lines, such as blades and the HPC markets.

This. CPUs are hungry.
Re:Intel Announces Optane DIMMs on Wednesday May 30, 2018 @03:17PM (#17190781)
The idea is to drive CPU utilization as well.

For example, in the x86 world, pairing NVMe drives with putting portions of the application writing to NVDIMM drives core performance, say, in SQL, from 40% util to 100% util.

Even a single 8Gb DIMM can dramatically increase utilization and performance.