Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened?
by floatingatoll on Friday June 08, 2018 @11:34AM
(#17266457)
This example would be a lot less ironically-unhelpful if 'apropos' were renamed 'help'.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened?
by teddyh on Friday June 08, 2018 @05:05PM
(#17269670)
The name “help” is, unfortunately, already taken by a shell built-in command. But one could argue that this help command should be very much more helpful than the restricted functionality it currently implements.
Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened?
by jandrese on Friday June 08, 2018 @03:21PM
(#17268831)
I think people would complain that apropos doesn't do its job if it were named help.
Apropos would be a powerful part of a "help" command, but in 50 years nobody has ever written a help command that gained enough traction to be included in the standard toolchain.
Re:Chatbots were the next big thing: what happened?
by floatingatoll on Monday June 11, 2018 @12:52PM
(#17286047)
Request granted!
Apropos doesn’t do it’s job because it isn’t named — or integrated with — help.